Angkrish Raghuvanshi Run Out: During the KKR vs LSG match in IPL 2026, a big controversy arose when Angkrish Raghuvanshi was given out under the ‘Obstructing the Field’ rule. There was anger in the KKR camp and debate on social media over the decision of the third umpire.
KKR vs LSG Run Out Controversy: Every season in IPL, there come some moments which not only remain a part of the match, but also become a subject of debate for a long time. In the 38th match of IPL 2026, one such dispute came to light between Kolkata Knight Riders and Lucknow Super Giants, which surprised everyone from players to fans.
After young batsman Angkrish Raghuvanshi was given out under ‘Obstructing the Field’, there was an uproar from social media to the dugout. Many people called it unfair to KKR, while some justified the third umpire’s decision as per the rules.
What happened after all?
Prince Yadav was bowling the 5th over of KKR’s innings. On the last ball of the over, Angkrish Raghuvanshi played the back of length ball towards mid-on with light hands and ran for the run. But his fellow batsman Cameron Green sent him back midway. Raghuvanshi returned midway and dived to reach the crease. Meanwhile, Mohammed Shami threw a fast throw, but the ball went straight to Raghuvanshi’s body. At first it seemed like a normal run-out attempt, but after this the biggest controversy of the match started.
Scroll to load tweet…
Why did the third umpire give out?
A mild appeal was made from Lucknow Super Giants. Initially it seemed that the batsmen were just trying to return to the crease, but the third umpire looked at the replays from a different perspective. Replays ruled that Raghuvanshi changed direction to get in line for the throw. His “turning radius” was considered higher than normal and it was also observed that he looked towards the direction of the ball. The third umpire concluded that the batsman deliberately obstructed the throw, so he was declared out under ‘Obstructing the Field’.
Raghuvanshi got angry at the decision
As soon as OUT appeared on the screen, Angkrish Raghuvanshi looked quite angry. He expressed his displeasure openly on the field itself. According to reports, he threw his helmet and also slammed the bat near the boundary line. Dissatisfaction regarding this decision was clearly visible in the KKR dugout also. Ultimately Raghuvanshi returned to the pavilion after scoring 9 runs on 8 balls, but the discussion started more on the manner of his dismissal than his runs.
What is the rule of ‘Obstructing the Field’?
‘Obstructing the Field’ is considered a very rare out in the rules of cricket. According to this rule, if the batsman deliberately obstructs the fielding team’s efforts while the ball is in play, he can be given out. For example-
- If the batsman tries to stop the throw by changing his direction while running
- If he intentionally prevents the ball from reaching the stumps with his bat or body
- Or intentionally come in the line of the fielder’s throw
So the umpire can give him out. The most important word here is “intentionally”. That means the decision completely depends on the intention of the batsman.
Was there any foul play with KKR?
This is the biggest question of this entire controversy. Many cricket experts and fans believe that Raghuvanshi was just trying to return to the crease and his aim was not to stop the throw. The umpire considered his movement intentional. Even on social media, fans were divided into two groups. Some called it a “harsh but correct decision as per the rules”, while many called it an injustice against KKR. Users on Reddit also reacted strongly to the decision.
Included in the most talked about events of IPL 2026
This out of Angkrish Raghuvanshi has become one of the most talked about and rare incidents of IPL 2026. Rules like ‘Obstructing the Field’ are not seen every day, and when such a decision is made under the pressure of a match, there is bound to be controversy. At the moment the question remains, was this the correct use of the rule, or was it dishonest on KKR? The answer may perhaps be found in the rules, but the debate is going to go on for a long time.