The Supreme Court has ordered to keep unclaimed dogs separated in Delhi. The court says that such unclaimed dogs cannot be allowed to roam the streets, mohallas and streets, which become a threat to anyone.
There are different opinions in the society regarding this order of the apex court. One section says that this decision of the Supreme Court is in the interest of society. At the same time, Dog Lovers says that such a decision is not practical. Dogs cannot be separated from the society and they have been a companion since man. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi have also questioned the decision of the Supreme Court.
Not only this, all the celebrities have also questioned the decision. Amidst this debate, the opinion of Mahatma Gandhi, who promotes the principle of non -violence in the world, also becomes relevant. He once allowed 60 such dogs to be killed, who had gone mad. When the question arose on this, he had also explained in detail why he took such a decision even after talking about non -violence. This incident is from 1926. 60 dogs went mad at textile businessman Ambalal Sarabhai’s mill. He was in danger to the people and Sarabhai ordered him to kill them.
On this, people raised questions and there was a dispute, then Sarabhai thought it appropriate to take Mahatma Gandhi’s opinion. He went to Sabarmati Ashram to meet Mahatma Gandhi. When he told the whole situation and told his decision to kill the dogs, Mahatma Gandhi asked what else can be done. This opinion of Mahatma Gandhi was also questioned and people asked why Mahatma Gandhi, who talked about non -violence, agreed to this. Mahatma Gandhi again spoke in detail about this and expressed his views through Young India newspaper.
What was Mahatma Gandhi’s less sins and more sins arguments
Mahatma Gandhi wrote, ‘There can be no doubt in the fact that Hindu philosophy considers the killing of any creature as a sin. I understand that all creeds will agree on this principle. The problem comes when it has to be brought into practice. We kill germs using pesticides. It is a violence, but also duty. Killing a mad dog is minimal violence. If someone lives in solitude in the forest, then he will not do such violence nor is it needed. But if someone lives in the city, then there will be a situation of contradiction for the principle of non -violence and duty for him. This is because the person living in the city has to protect himself and those who depend on him. If he kills the dog, it will be a sin and if he does not kill, he will commit more sin than that. Therefore, he will choose less sin so that he can avoid great sin. ‘
What was the advice given to society on unclaimed dogs
Apart from this, Mahatma Gandhi also advised the society about unclaimed dogs. He said that how much civilization is a civilization, it shows what is the situation of animals that are in the middle of it. If the dogs are walking around, then it shows that there is no kind of mercy in the society. He wrote, ‘The dog is a loyal companion. There are many examples of the loyalty of dogs and horses. This means that we should keep them and respect them in the same way that we do our colleagues and they should not be allowed to roam like this. ‘
It was said- Dogs’ unclaimed roaming the subject of shame for society
Describing keeping unclaimed dogs on the streets, Gandhiji said that a human person should keep a part of his income separate and give it to an organization that takes care of the dogs. Gandhiji had said- ‘If he cannot do this, then he should give up concern over the question of dogs and put his humanity in the service of other animals.’
(The above symbolic photo is designed from Meta AI)