Shadow on social media Anirudddhacharya controversy: Did saints forgot dignity?
Women’s organizations strongly condemned
Women’s rights organizations, social activists and youth have strongly condemned this statement. Swati Maliwal, Chairman of Delhi Women’s Commission also Anirudddhacharya controversy Describing it as ‘gross objectionable’, he has demanded immediate legal action.
Will FIR be recorded?
According to sources, a complaint has been filed in Mumbai and Delhi regarding this video. Action is being raised under sections 294 (pornographic work), 509 (hurting the dignity of the woman) and the IT Act of the IPC.
This is not the first controversy of Anirudhacharya
Controversial statements have also been given in the past
Anirudddhacharya controversy There is nothing new. Earlier, many of his videos have come out in which statements of objectionable or double meanings have been found about women.
What do social reviewers say?
Famous sociologist Dr. Rakesh Gupta says –
“When such anti -female statements come out from religious forums, it is an insult not only to women but also to religion and culture.”
Language like ‘mouth’ – does it suit a saint?
Limits of dignity
The stage of religion is a symbol of discipline, restraint and dignity. The use of words like “four places is killed” from such a platform is not only shameful but it gives the wrong message to the audience.
Negative effects on youth
Experts believe that such viral videos can bend the thinking and attitude of the youth in the wrong direction. When a person with image -like image uses such a language, it has side effects on the whole society.
Flood of reactions on social media
#Anirudddhacharyacontroversy Trend on Twitter
Following this statement, hashtags like #AniruddhacharyacontRoversy and #ARRESTANRUDDHACHARAYA are trending on Twitter.
Some reactions:
- @Voiceofher: “Is it a saint or a man of a road -ranked mindset? Stop humiliating women like this!”
- @Youthforjustice: “Stop spreading poison in society by becoming a religious leader. FIR should be.”
- @Sanskriti “It is important to have restraint and dignity in the language of narrators. What is this discourse?”
Reaction of legal and religious organizations
Hindu Mahasabha’s sharp reaction
The Hindu Mahasabha has demanded public forgiveness and boycott from Sant Samaj, calling this statement “insult to religion”. General Secretary Shri Tathaan Ghosh said,
“The person who insults women from the stage is not a saint, not a saint.”
ISKCON and other saints also expressed resentment
Prabhu Govind Das, senior spokesperson of ISKCON said –
“We separate ourselves from the statement of Anirudhacharya. It is neither Vedic nor spiritual. There is no place for vulgarity in the name of propagation of religion.”
What will be further action?
NCW took cognizance
The National Commission for Women (NCW) has taken self -cognizance about this statement and has started the process of issuing notice to the concerned state government.
Monitoring on YouTube channel
Anirudhacharya’s YouTube channel has more than 2 million subscribers. In such a situation, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is reviewing the content of this channel. The channel can also be blocked if porn or derogatory material is found.
Anirudddhacharya controversy Debate on the responsibility of religious forums opened
Are religious platforms now becoming the hub of obscenity? Should there be no sensors on the speeches of the storytellers? Anirudddhacharya controversy It has made it clear that the time has come when it is necessary to question the dignity of saints or narrators. It is neither socially acceptable to humiliate women by taking the name of religion, nor from a religious point of view.
Now it is the turn of society, law and media – that they should decide, should such people be given a platform, or should they be marginalized.