Recently he has come into the limelight due to his controversial statement. During a religious gathering in Mathura in 2025, Anirudhacharya made objectionable remarks about the age and their character of the girls, after which various sections of the society and women and social organizations saw anger against it. After this statement, he faced widespread criticism on social media. Along with this, women lawyers have also demanded legal action on them. In response, Anirudhacharya has publicly apologized.
Anirudhacharya made controversial statement
Anirudhacharya had commented on the age of the girls’ marriage during one of her legends. In which he said that ‘girls are completely mature by the age of 25 years, due to which the chances of pre-milestone relationship increase by getting married late.’ Many people considered this statement as orthodoxy and derogatory towards women. The Mathura Bar Association and women advocates described this statement as not only sexually insensitive but also socially harmful. On social media too, many users called it ‘insulting women’ and ‘against culture’, after which there was a demand for a police complaint against them.
Troll on social media
After this statement, Anirudhacharya was trolled on social media platforms. Many users described his statement as a symbol of ‘cheap’ and ‘mental distortion’. For example, a user wrote that ‘a person who sit on the throne of religion and has such dirty thinking for women, not a narrator, should be called’ alleged indulgent ‘.’ Political parties like Samajwadi Party also condemned this statement and described it against social values. The Mathura Bar Association met the district police chief and demanded an FIR against Anirudhacharya and public forgiveness. The controversy not only questioned the credibility of his discourses but also sparked a debate on the responsibility of statements made from religious forums.
Anirudhacharya apologizes
After the controversy escalated, Anirudhacharya regretted his statement and apologized. He said that ‘you heard half the video, in the video in which there are some girls who will be able to live in the lived, to become someone’s daughter -in -law, after being a daughter -in -law. You tell me? Both a girl or boy should be characteristics first. This has been said for some girls and individuals. As King Raghuvanshi was killed by his wife, she was 25 years old. She has hit her husband because of a foreign man. I said some girls, but some were removed from my video.
Along with this, he said that some words have been removed from our video. I never insult a woman. Woman is Lakshmi. In our Braj, Shyam Sundar presses the feet of Radharani. If you hurt your heart with half my heart, then I apologize. His intention was not to hurt anyone’s feelings and if his words have hurt anyone, they apologize for this. He also clarified that his statement was taken into a ‘wrong context’ and he has always been in favor of promoting eternal values. He said that women are revered in our religion and we respect them.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/167mcydxw/
Anirudhacharya has been in controversies before
This is not the first time Anirudhacharya is surrounded by controversies due to his statements. In 2022, she commented on the beauty of women during a religious discourse, in which she said that ‘excessive beauty is’ fault for women and mythological women like Sita and Draupadi suffered suffering due to their ‘extra beauty’. This statement was also considered to promote the mentality of false and blame the victim.
In addition, in 2024, he made a statement about Lord Shiva, after which he had to apologize. Her statements have often included comments on women’s clothes, lifestyle and morality, which according to their critics promote stereotypes and gender discrimination.