For the unversed, are fighting a legal case against Priya, their stepmother, over a Rs 30,000 crore estate left behind by their late father, alleging that the will has been forged by her.
Priya Kapur seeks access to Sunjay Kapur and Karisma Kapoor’s divorce papers
In response to Priya’s application seeking access to the divorce proceedings, NDTV’s report claimed that Karisma’s lawyers argued that it was not maintainable as the consent terms and the divorce decree were already filed by Priya in another matter in the Delhi High Court.
Priya’s application was considered in-chamber hearing and seeks certified copies of the divorce settlement and custody arrangements finalised in 2016. Kapur’s counsel submitted that these documents are directly relevant to the present estate litigation, where issues concerning financial provision, child support, and post-divorce obligations have been repeatedly raised before the Delhi High Court.
Karisma and Sunjay’s divorce
Karisma and Sunjay’s divorce was widely reported at the time as contentious. Court records and contemporaneous media reports indicate that the proceedings involved serious allegations and counter-allegations relating to marital conduct, financial arrangements, and custody. The matter ultimately concluded through a settlement recorded, which addressed custody of the children as well as financial terms agreed between the parties.
As per reports, during the ongoing estate dispute, submissions have been made regarding the children’s financial arrangements and education expenses, bringing renewed focus on what was agreed between the former spouses at the time of divorce.
Karisma Kapoor vs Priya Kapur
Senior counsel Maninder Singh, on behalf of Priya, indicated that clarity on the divorce settlement is necessary to assess whether issues now being raised were already addressed and resolved during Sunjay’s lifetime. Replying to Priya’s counsel’s demand, Karisma’s lawyers, Ravi Sharma and Apoorv Shukla, objected to the application, calling it ‘frivolous’. They claimed that it was intended to dig out personal information in a matter from the family court, which is confidential between the former couple.
After hearing Karisma’s defence, the Supreme Court granted her two weeks to put her objections in the form of a reply.