Pakistan’s PM Shahbaz Sharif raised the issue of Kashmir in London.
Balochistan is not careful. P.O.K. Freedom slogans are sharp. The postponement of the Indus Water Treaty is outcry. Trump dispelled the status of the Civil Government of Pakistan by directing lunch to Field Marshal Munir. The gardener is in a bad condition. Operation Sindoor forgot the arrogance of atomic strength. Now how to divert the attention of angry public? The same old Kashmir raga, which Pakistan has been repeating since coming into existence. It is interesting that while in power, Pakistan’s leadership dreams and shows Kashmir. There are gifts on India. But as soon as it is removed from the chair, the eyes closed intentionally opens. One feels your status. And start accepting themselves that Pakistan has that Kashmiri will accept to be a part of Pakistan?
Shahbaz Sharif is not separated from the rest of Pakistan’s leaders. Yesterday, he again remembered Kashmir at a meeting of migrant Pakistanis in London. As expected, the responsibility of establishing peace there on India. Reiterated the charge of adopting a conflict on India. But what did this Shahbaz think about Kashmir when they were away from power? Of course, his interview is in the old days when he took refuge in Saudi Arabia with elder brother Nawaz Sharif. But this is still important today, because then the Kashmiris’ thinking about Pakistan and the status of Pakistan about Pakistan from the lips of Sharif away from Pakistan. Read what he said then from Pakistani journalist Suhail BadaH?
Desperate Shahbaz left the question of Kashmir Allah trust
Shahbaz had said that war is not a solution to Kashmir problem. However, he emphasized that the existence of Pakistan remained due to its nuclear force. But will Kashmir be a part of Pakistan ever? Due to three wars from India and heavy losses in them, Shahbaz had left this hope on Allah. He then said, “Allah should prove to be true. But the fifty six years have passed. It could not be made. Today, you will remember what I am saying. If we keep this way, even if we have five hundred years, Kashmir will not be part of Pakistan, Pakistan. Will we be giving any models to Kashmiris, which they will meet us?”
Pak PM on Kashmir had clearly said that Even after five hundred years, Kashmir will not be our part. Photo: Getty Images
Kashmiri is not blind and deep
Suhail will not be part of our part even after five hundred years of Shahbaz’s word, repeating the same question once again. Shahbaz was standing on the reply given earlier, “It will not be made. You should consider God as a witness and put a hand on your heart and tell me where the police stations are being tortured. There is no hearing of innocents. You are fighting each other. Poverty is increasing. Poverty is increasing. The poor are not asking for the poor, whose lathi is the law of his buffalo. Will you like to live with you. They are more educated by you.
Kashmir will be a dream
When Shahbaz, who was away from Pakistan’s nuclear strength in talk, was away from the chair, he saw another way to solve the Kashmir problem. He had said to Suhail BadaH, “There is only one solution that happened in Germany. The way Eastern and West Germany did, this is the solution to Kashmir. The way he did not sit frustrated with his defeat, he continued to work hard. He went on the collections. Walked on the recovery. For fifty years, he remained in the work and East Germany fell like a fruit ripe in his bag.
Millions of youth with their passion dropped the Berlin wall with the stumbling of the foot. What was the miracle of this? Only economic power was amazing. If we had adopted this method, Kashmir would have been ours within five years of Pakistan’s existence. If you still cannot do this, then even after the next five hundred years, Kashmir will not be a part of Pakistan.
Pakistan Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif. (File photo)
Shahbaz wanted a flexible stand of Pak army
On the question of Kashmir, did the Nawaz-Shabaz brothers think this is the reason for the resentment and Kargil of the Pak Army? Shahbaz’s answer to the then makes it clear that the civil government there believes in the flexible and practical way to settle the Kashmir problem. On the other hand, the attitude of the army is stubborn.
Shahbaz said in that interview, “See, the thing is that there are stable views of the army in some cases (reference-Kashmir). There was no intervention of any civilian government about the situation of the Taliban. Then you tell me where he went, their thinking. What is the truth and under which law you are thinking?
Shahbaz Sharif India has put the responsibility of establishing peace in Kashmir. Photo: Getty Images
Who is cheating Shahbaz?
Then now why are Shahbaz sitting on the Prime Minister’s chair, and why are they keeping the public of Pakistan in deception by turning their own thinking on the question of Kashmir? In fact, they are well aware that the Prime Minister and the civil government in Pakistan has no status in front of the army there. This truth was accepted by the coup of elder brother Nawaz Sharif’s government, being imprisoned in jail and exile of the Sharif family.
He had told Suhail BadaH, “In fact, the army has been playing an open role in the country for 28 years. He has played a role behind the scenes in the rest of the years. This is open true. There is no two opinions in it.” Shahbaz had tried unsuccessfully to build a bridge between Nawaz Sharif-Musharraf while tying the knot of this truth.
In view of the power of the army, he was not in favor of Musharraf’s dismissal and he had differences with his brother Nawaz on this issue. Why did Shahbaz’s victory celebrate there even after Pakistan’s bad defeat in Operation Sindoor during the current government? Why was Munir awarded the position of Field Marshal? Trump’s Munir was described by lunch invitation in the world of Shahbaz government. Still why Shahbaz is frozen on the chair? To answer such questions, the old interview of Shahbaz should be read. He had advised the army to flexible stance. The army considered it unnecessary. But why make Shahbaz forgetting the strength of the army in Pakistan or the mistake of shaking eyes with it? He had considered military intervention as necessary under the guise of national interest during the days of his family in the hands of the army and said, “There should be a coordination from this institution (army) which is in the national interest.”
Also read: How is electricity from hydro power plant? PM Modi laid the foundation stone