Property disputes between father and son are often coming, but sometimes the dispute between father and daughter about property (Property Knowledge) is so deep that the matter reaches the court.
Mahindra Thar Roxx: How much is the base model of Mahindra Thar Rocks, know which features are available
The court gave this verdict –
After this decision of the Supreme Court, now those daughters will not be able to participate in their father’s property, who do not want to stay with the father’s opposition. This decision is a new twist for families where earlier daughters could also claim their participation. The Supreme Court (SC Decisoin on Property Rights) has challenged many old legal aspects with its decision in the case.
Can not ask for education and marriage
A case was heard in the Supreme Court, in which two judges ruled that if a girl is about 20 years old and does not want to have a relationship with her father, she cannot demand any expenses from her father’s property (Daughter’s Property Rights on Father’s Property) for her studies and marriage. The court said that it did not have the right to demand such a demand. This decision was on the rights related to the daughter’s property and shows that no one has the right to demand expenses from the property if there is a rift in the relationship.
The Supreme Court also made it clear –
The Supreme Court made it clear that if the daughter does not want to have a relationship with her father, she would not get any right to the father’s property (Property Rights for Daughters). Parents have been divorced in this case, and the petitioner moved the Supreme Court to separate from his wife. The court approved the divorce application. The court said that the wife is living with her brother, while the husband is taking care of her daughter’s education and other expenses. Apart from this, the husband has made arrangements to give an interim alimony of Rs 8000 a month to the wife. It became clear from this decision that if the daughter does not have a relationship with her father, she would not have any right related to property rights.
This amount will remain with the mother-
The court, while giving a verdict in a case, said that the husband can give Rs 10 lakh to his wife as a lump sum. The Supreme Court (SC Decision on Daughter’s Property Right) also clarified that if the mother helps her daughter, then the zodiac will remain with the mother. This means that no one else will have the right to the amount received by the wife. The decision was related to the distribution of property and financial rights between the husband and wife, in which the mother also had a role.
The matter was going on for so long –
In one case, the husband had applied in the district court and there was a decision in his favor. The wife then moved to the High Court, where the divorce application was rejected. Then the matter reached the Supreme Court (SC Decision on Daughter Property Rights), where the court now gave its verdict. In this entire episode, the courts saw the dispute between the husband and wife and now the Supreme Court’s decision was considered to be the final. The court’s decision has come in mind the claims and circumstances of both sides.
After this amendment, daughters got the right in the property –
Gold Rate: Gold prices fell, know 22 and 24 carat gold rates
There is a 1965 law in India, which makes rules related to property sharing. This law was changed in 2005, giving sons and daughters equal rights in ancestral property. Earlier, Daughters Property Rights did not get a share in the property, but got the right after a revision of 2005. The amendment was made in the Hindu Succession Act, 1965 (Hindu Succession Act, 1965).