A few users said police personnel themselves work under pressure to meet challan targets. They argued that such targets may force officers to act strictly even during emergencies.
Others questioned why the public is fined for small violations while larger civic issues like potholes, bike theft, hospital bed shortages, and security lapses remain unaddressed.
Some sarcastically commented that police action is fastest when it comes to issuing challans, faster than emergency services.
Debate over VVIP movement claim
The suggestion that the challans were issued to ensure VVIP movement also drew mixed reactions.
Some users accused those spreading the claim of creating a misleading narrative. They said the police action was only meant to keep traffic moving smoothly and avoid jams during rain.
Others mocked the idea, saying common citizens are always expected to adjust while VVIPs get priority.
Overall, the video has sparked a strong emotional response, reflecting a wider debate on road discipline versus human compassion.
While many believe the police acted lawfully and responsibly, others feel the situation demanded understanding rather than punishment.
As of now, there has been no official clarification from the police on whether challans were issued or whether any VVIP movement was involved.