The United States is refocusing on the Western Hemisphere as geopolitical competition intensifies. China’s growing trade and infrastructure investments across Latin America, including projects linked to the Belt and Road Initiative, have raised concerns in Washington.
By Dr Aparaajita Pandey
The Western Hemisphere or more accurately the Americas, have found themselves surprisingly not as a priority for much of the post – Cold War era. NATO and the US’ attention has been commanded by crises around the world, more often than not, of their own making. China, West Asia, Europe, and South Asia; have all found themselves being priority for the US; Latin America and the Caribbean even after being the so-called American Backyard have found it difficult to be a priority for the US.
However, that phase of neglect seems to be on its way out. A mixture of great-power competition, migration pressures, energy politics, and the growing presence of China has forced Washington to remember the significance of its immediate neighborhood.
This shift mirrors one of the oldest principles of American foreign policy. In 1823, the Monroe Doctrine declared the Americas were a domain of the US and any intrusion by European powers would be considered a threat to the US. This move established not just the idea that stability in the Americas was central to U.S. security but, also set a precedent that would allow US an entry into Latin America. Over the next century this established and acknowledged principle shaped American interventions across the region, from the -Spanish-American War of 1898, which underlined U.S. influence in the Caribbean, to Cold War policies aimed at preventing Soviet penetration of the hemisphere to the Banana Republics of Central America.
The Cold War gave the Americas a clear strategic relevance, the collapse of the Soviet Union however, became a threshold and let Washington redirect its attention elsewhere. Latin America was largely assumed to be politically stable and firmly embedded within the U.S.-led economic order. The embeddedness of the US, however, is now being questioned.
China and the New Hemispheric Competition
One of the most critical factors of renewed American concentration to the region is China’s vast economic presence across Latin America which surely has the potential to become political in the coming future. Beijing has become one of the region’s most crucial trading partners and investors. Chinese investment has sponsored major infrastructure projects, including ports, energy facilities, mining ventures, and telecommunications networks.
Several Latin American states have joined China’s Belt and Road Initiative, while Chinese companies have gained access to strategic sectors ranging from lithium extraction to digital infrastructure. For the US, these developments are worrisome as they carry consequences that extend beyond economics. Infrastructure and technology networks are increasingly viewed through the lens of geopolitical competition. The Latin American region is therefore becoming an addition to the larger strategic rivalry between the United States and China.
Energy and its Compulsions
Latin America is home to some of the world’s most significant reserves of critical minerals. The lithium triangle of Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile holds more than half of the world’s known lithium reserves, while countries such as Peru and Chile dominate global copper production.
New hydrocarbon discoveries are reshaping the energy geography of the hemisphere. The crude oil boom in Guyana is rapidly converting the South American state into one of the fastest-growing energy producers in the world. Meanwhile, Venezuela’s vast oil reserves persist in shaping regional geopolitics in spite of the years of turmoil.
These advances are taking place at a time when global supply chains are becoming increasingly politicized. Access to strategic resources has become a core component of geoeconomic competition between major powers.
Migration and Domestic Politics
Pressures within the United States have also promoted the strategic importance of the Americas. Migration from Central America and Venezuela have become a distinguishing factor in American politics, linking domestic debates about border security directly to political and economic conditions across the region.
This dynamic is reinforcing the argument among policymakers that the Western Hemisphere cannot be treated as a secondary theatre in American strategy.
A More Autonomous Hemisphere
The return of the Americas to American strategic thinking should not be confused with a return to the geopolitical conditions of the past. Unlike during the Cold War, Latin American countries at present pursue more diverse foreign policies. Governments tend to maintain economic and diplomatic ties not only with the United States but also with China, the European Union, India, and other emerging powers.
This is also reminiscent of the broader of the broader change in the world and the shift towards multipolarity. For the US this means influence in the hemisphere must depend on diplomacy, economic engagement, and technological cooperation than the hierarchical dominance that characterized earlier periods.
Geography Returns to Strategy
For decades, American strategy was influenced predominantly by events in distant theatres. But as geopolitical competition intensifies and supply chains become strategic assets, geography is once again asserting itself. Influence over resources, infrastructure, migration routes, and technological networks is progressively becoming intrinsic to regional stability and alignment. The US is remembering a truth it once understood well; global influence begins at home.
But contrasting to the era of the Monroe Doctrine, the Americas today are rooted in a profoundly interconnected world. External powers are already cemented economically, and Latin American states themselves have greater agency than ever before.
The Western Hemisphere is again central to American strategy. The challenge however, for Washington is fundamentally not entirely new but one that they have never been able to overcome; to essentially hold a region that is no longer willing to be held.
The author is a Professor at the department of Defence and Strategic Studies at Amity University, NOIDA
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views or stance of the organization. The organization assumes no responsibility for the content shared.