Rahul Gandhi-Ravneet Bittu Clash over Traitor Remarks and Leaders’ Strong Reactions Explained

BJP spokesperson Jaiveer Shergill also criticised Rahul Gandhi, saying his words insulted the entire Sikh community.

In a post on X, Shergill said Sikhs have always served and protected the nation, unlike Gandhi, whom he accused of questioning the Army and defaming India.

He called Gandhi’s remarks “shameful and disgusting” and said such behaviour showed he was not fit to be the Leader of Opposition.

Political reactions widen

Several BJP leaders echoed similar sentiments, saying the remark crossed a line and showed lack of respect for a community that has made major sacrifices for the country.

They argued that disagreements over party switching should not be turned into personal or community-based insults.

Congress leaders, however, have largely defended Gandhi, saying the exchange was provoked and taken out of context.

Why the remark has caused such anger

The word “traitor” carries deep emotional weight in Indian politics. When used against a Sikh leader, it touches old wounds related to historical trauma, discrimination, and violence.

Many Sikh leaders said that linking a Sikh identity with betrayal is especially painful given the community’s history of service in the armed forces and public life.

This is why the remark has been seen not just as a political insult, but as a broader community issue.

Speaker urged to take action

Manjinder Singh Sirsa and other BJP leaders have urged Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to take immediate action against Rahul Gandhi.

They argue that such language on Parliament premises violates decorum and dignity expected from elected representatives.

So far, there has been no official response from the Speaker’s office.

The incident comes at a time when Parliament has already been tense, with suspensions, protests, and sharp debates between the government and opposition.

Political observers say such confrontations may further harden positions and distract from legislative work.

At the same time, the controversy has reopened debates around political language, respect, and responsibility of senior leaders.

(With inputs from agencies)

Leave a Comment