The Government of India amended the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules (CCSP Rules), via the Finance Bill 2025, in an unprecedented manner, seeking validation of the CCSP Rules and ‘principles for expenditure on pension liabilities from the Consolidated Fund of India’ (CFA).
This legislative action ‘restates’ the powers of the Union/Central Government/Government of India (GOI) ‘to establish distinctions among pensioners as a general principle’ and not be bound by the right determined by the court judgements on all similarly-situated old pensioners to receive equal pension.
Assumption of such powers just before the constitution of the 8th Central Pay Commission (8th CPC), in what appears to be a surreptitious and rushed manner, has surprised the government pensioner community and has undoubtedly led to considerable unease.Why did the GOI decide to ‘restate’ its powers and effectively neutralise the Supreme Court’s judgements? Is it to task and nudge the 8th CPC to not make recommendations treating old pensioners equal? Will pensioners who retired before 2026 be denied the benefits of the next pay commission’s recommendations?
A Strategic and Unprecedented Move
Part IV of the Finance Bill 2025, introduced via government amendments on 24 March and passed by the Lok Sabha on 25 March, uses the authority of Parliament under Article 309 to make laws regulating conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts by GOI and special powers of Lok Sabha over ‘money bills’.The new law essentially reiterates and validates the GOI’s interpretation of CCSP rules that ‘past and future pensioners cannot be treated at par’ and that ‘benefit of improvement in the pension would be available to newly retiring pensioners from a prospective date’.
GOI, in a long preamble to Part IV, claimed that this was the position adopted by the Central Pay Commissions (CPCs) and the Courts until the 6th CPC. However, it argues that it is only the Supreme Court’s judgement in Union of India and Ors. vs All India S-30 Pensioners Association and Ors (All India S-30 Pensioners Case) which ‘obliterated such distinction and proceeded on the premise that the government lacks authority for providing for such distinction of the central government pensioners based on their date of retirement’.The government is quite blunt and unapologetic dealing ‘with the interpretation of the courts’ and retaining the ‘relevance of having such distinction’.
For perhaps the first time, the GOI has resorted to using the Finance Bill process to effect such amendments and validations in matters of recruitment and conditions of services of civil servants.
A Reversal of Pensioners’ Rights
The civil servants initially received, in general, pension equal to 50 percent of average emoluments upon retirement after full, qualifying service of 33 years. Over the last four decades, this was improved significantly. To cite a few examples:
- 50 percent pension was granted after completing 20 years of service.
- Average emoluments was replaced by last month’s pay.
- Minimum pension was significantly enhanced.
- Additional pension (20 percent to 100 percent of pension) was granted to pensioners aged 80 years and more.
- The principle of one rank/scale one pension was adopted, resulting in the pensions getting revised whenever new pay scales were introduced.
Almost all these benefits were granted by the GOI, either on its own or based on the recommendations of PCs, at par with the current employees/new pensioners.
As a result, over the years, irrespective of when someone retired -even 40 or 50 years earlier-a pensioner’s pension was ‘equal’ to the pension of the similarly situated latest retiree. This principle was upheld until the GOI lost the All India S-30 case in Delhi High Court in March 2024, and its special leave petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court in September 2024.At the heart of the All India S-30 Case was the contentious issue which has been at the root of one rank one pay/pension controversy as well.
The 6th PC had recommended Rs 67000-79000 as Scale-30/S-30, replacing the 5th PC scale of Rs 22,400-525-24,500. The pay/pension of a 6th PC employee was fixed in between Rs 67,000 and Rs 79,000, depending upon the employee’s stay in service in Rs 22,400-525-24500 scale.
The pre-6th PC retired officers wanted their pension to be fixed similarly, ie, after taking into account the stage, in the scale at which he/she retired. But in some cases, the government decided to fix the pension, taking the minimum pay of Rs 67,000 in consideration.
The Delhi High Court judgement deciding against GOI (and in favour of pensioners) and the Supreme Court dismissal of GOI’s special leave petition created a right for the old pensioners to get their pension fixed in the manner that the pensioners wanted.
The part IV of Finance Act 2025 seeks to evaporate this right.
Modi’s Role: A Political Calculus?
Recall the COVID-19 crisis. On the verge of the Supreme Court ordering free vaccine supply throughout India, Prime Minister Modi decided to make the vaccine free all over the country, making the apex court’s ruling unnecessary. The petrol pumps all over the country beamed the face of Modi rolling out free COVID-19 vaccines for India.A similar situation is now unfolding with pensions. The court judgements in the All India S-30 Case had vested a right in all similarly-situated pensioners to receive all future CPC benefits, regardless of when a pensioner retired. Unless the courts declare the Part IV of Finance Act 2025 unconstitutional, that right now stands abolished.
The Part IV of Finance Act 2025 will, undoubtedly, echo in the Terms of Reference (ToRs) for the 8th CPC, dissuading it from treating older pensioners equally. Still, whatever the 8th CPC recommends, the GOI-and, ultimately, with Prime Minister Modi-will determine which benefits will be extended to the old pensioners and which won’t be.Yet, not all is lost at this stage. It seems fairly certain that Modi will grant all the 8th CPC benefits to the old retirees as well.
While it is quite unlikely that the 8th CPC will recommend (like the 7th PC) fixing pensions of old pensioners at the stage of pay-scale (instead of at the minimum), taking into account service rendered in scale, Modi may still grant the benefit to old pensioners.
So the pensioners might get the benefit-not as a right, but at the sweet will of Modi.
(Subhash Chandra Garg is the Chief Policy Advisor, SUBHANJALI, and Former Finance and Economic Affairs Secretary, Government of India. He’s the author of many books, including ‘The $10 Trillion Dream Dented, We Also Make Policy, and Explanation and Commentary on Budget 2024-25’. This is an opinion piece, and the views expressed above are the author’s own.The Quintneither endorses nor is responsible for the same.)