P Chidambaram voiced concern over 5.25 lakh dog bites and 28 rabies deaths in Tamil Nadu. He urged dog lovers to support sequestering, sterilising, and vaccinating strays, highlighting Supreme Court directives for public safety.
Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram on Wednesday expressed concern over the alarming rise in the number of dog bites and rabies-related deaths in Tamil Nadu. Quoting data, Chidambaram stated that the state has recorded approximately 5.25 lakh dog bite cases and 28 deaths due to rabies this year alone.
In a post on X, Chidambaram said, “According to a newspaper report, Tamil Nadu recorded 5,25,000 cases of dog bites this year (so far) and 28 deaths due to rabies” According to a newspaper report, Tamil Nadu recorded 5,25,000 cases of dog bites this year (so far) and 28 deaths due to rabies Dog lovers’ concerns are valid but they should also consider the alarming data Being a dog lover is not antagonistic to support sequestering stray… — P. Chidambaram (@PChidambaram_IN) November 18, 2025
Chidambaram Urges Balanced Approach
Chidambaram emphasised that dog lovers’ concerns are valid, but they must also acknowledge the gravity of the situation. He stressed that being a dog lover does not contradict supporting measures like sequestering, sterilising, and vaccinating stray dogs. “Dog lovers’ concerns are valid but they should also consider the alarming data. Being a dog lover is not antagonistic to support sequestering stray dogs, sterilising them, and vaccinating them”, the post read.
He further stated that the Supreme Court has directed the release of vaccinated dogs back into their habitats, except in certain public places. Chidambaram urged dog lovers to support and aid in implementing the Court’s directives, emphasising that these measures are designed to ensure the safety of street users, particularly children, women, and senior citizens. “The Supreme Court has directed the release of the vaccinated dogs in their old habitats (except in some public places). There is no attempt to eliminate stray dogs. Dog lovers must support and help in the implementation of the Court-directed measures. They are for the safety of street-users especially children, women and senior citizens,” the post concluded.
Supreme Court Orders Removal of Strays from Public Places
Chidambaram’s remark comes following the Supreme Court, while taking into consideration the “alarming rise of dog bite incidents”, ordered all states and Union Territories (UTs) to ensure the removal of all stray dogs from every educational institution, hospital, public sports complexes, bus stands, railway stations, etc. The dogs will not return to their respective areas after the sterilisation.
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria stated that all these institutions and places must be properly fenced to prevent the entry of stray dogs. The stray dogs should not be released to the same spot from which they were picked up, the bench ordered. It also said that permitting their return would “frustrate the very purpose” of securing such premises and addressing public safety concerns.”They will not be released back in the same area since releasing them back will frustrate the very purpose of the directive of the court,” said the bench.
It will be the responsibility of the concerned local government institutions to collect stray dogs from such institutions/areas and transfer them to designated dog shelters after vaccination and sterilisation in accordance with the Animal Birth Control Rules, the bench directed. Chief Secretaries of all states and Union Territories shall ensure strict compliance with the order; otherwise, officers will be held personally responsible, it said.
The apex court also stated that a nodal officer must be appointed for the upkeep and surveillance of each such premises, and local municipal authorities and panchayats must conduct periodic inspections for at least three months and report back to the court. It asked the status report to be filed within eight weeks, indicating a mechanism had been developed to carry out directions.
The top court also directed the states, UTs, and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and other agencies to remove stray cattle and animals from national and state highways and ensure they are kept in shelters where they will be properly cared for.
Previous Court Orders on Stray Dog Menace
The apex court took suo motu cognisance of the menace of stray dogs across the country.
August 22 Order: A Modified Approach
A three-judge bench on August 22 had modified a two-judge bench’s August 11 order, which had directed the rounding up of all stray dogs in the Delhi-NCR and prohibited their release from dog shelters. The August 22 order stated that the stray dogs would be released back to the same area after sterilisation and immunisation, except for those dogs infected with rabies or exhibiting aggressive behaviour. It had also restricted public feeding of stray dogs and directed the MCD to create dedicated feeding spaces in each municipal ward. It had further ordered that persons found feeding the dogs in contravention of its direction shall be liable to be proceeded with under the relevant framework. The apex court had also expanded the scope of the proceedings on the menace of stray dogs and impleaded all states and Union Territories as parties to the case.
August 11 Order: Initial Directive for Delhi-NCR
The August 11 order was limited to the Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR) area only. The three-judge bench order came in response to pleas seeking a stay of the August 11 order of a two-judge bench, which had directed the removal of all stray dogs from localities in the Delhi-NCR region and their placement in shelter homes.
On August 11, the top court ordered that all localities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram, and Faridabad should be made free of stray dogs, with no compromise. Also, it made it clear that no captured animal would be released back onto the streets.
In the detailed order, it has been clarified that its directive was not driven by “momentary impulse”; rather, it came after thorough and careful deliberation, and the concerned authorities have consistently failed for over two decades to effectively address a serious issue that directly impacts public safety. A bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and R Madadev had said that it has decided to take the matter in its hands becasue of the systematic failure of the authorities over the past two decades to address an issue that strikes at the heart of public safety. It had said that the directions given by it, as a court which functions for the welfare of the people, are both in the interest of humans as well as dogs and “this is not personal”. It had noted that, according to the data available on the Press Information Bureau’s website, there were 37,15,713 reported dog bites in the country, and in Delhi alone, there were 25,201 dog bites. (ANI)
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)