The bench said the selection should be based only on merit. The top court was hearing a writ petition of two women, who ranked fifth and sixth in merit, and challenged the Army’s gender-based vacancy split (six for men, three for women) in the JAG Entry.
Justice Manmohan directed the Centre to commission one of the two petitioners into the JAG department. The court found that the second petitioner is not entitled to any relief.
“No nation can be secure if such policies are followed. Union is directed to conduct recruitment in the aforesaid manner and publish a combined merit list for all candidates, which includes men and women candidates,” the bench said.
Earlier, while reserving its judgment, the bench noted that it was prima facie satisfied with the petitioner’s case and had ordered her induction. The court had sharply questioned the justification for maintaining a fixed male-to-female intake ratio, asserting that genuine gender parity should be based on merit rather than quotas.