Nepal: Farewell of fourteen governments in 17 years, will something change with the election, how many challenges in front of the interim PM?

Sushila Karki’s interim government in Nepal has taken over the functioning.

Sushila Karki’s oath system as Prime Minister in Nepal is a good step towards bringing the oath system on the way. Only an estimate can be made about what will be the situation in the next few days. In reality, the situation in which the coup has overtaken there, it has almost crippled the entire system not only the economic system of Nepal.

The youth on the streets have rejected the political leadership of Nepal. There is a crisis of leadership. Looking for the way. In the next few days, the interim government coming into existence will also face a lot of difficulties.

Will something improve with the new election?

It will be the responsibility of the interim government that the system can be worthy that new elections can be held there within a year for the next six months. But will the government coming to existence there to meet the expectations and aspirations of the agitators after the next election? From now on, this question is arising because fourteen governments have been farewell in Nepal in the last 17 years.

After the departure of the monarchy in 2008, the round of elected governments began. But these governments could not give stability to the country. Conditions worsened between the formation of governments. Corruption, inflation, unemployment increased. The country got caught in the whirlpool of problems. The results have been seen as recent broad violence, which have shaken Nepal’s stems.

Failure of governments provoked anger

In 2006, there was a widespread mass movement against the monarchy in Nepal. Those who led the movement had raised the public, blaming Nepal’s poverty, lack, backwardness and problems. The public uprooted the monarchy. Development, good and prosperity and democracy were considered an alternative for developed Nepal.

The constitution also became in 2015. But between 2008 and 2025, the use of democratic governments in Nepal failed badly in terms of fulfillment of public aspirations. This failure did not just disappoint people. Elections were not awaited to change the government, which was furious to this extent. The inundation of the youth took to the streets and forced the people sitting in power to escape by saving their lives.

The front path is very difficult

This movement and violence, which became known as Gen-Z, was automatically spontaneous or a conspiracy of any foreign power, its knots remain to be solved. If there is any external strength behind it, is its agenda fulfilled with the attitude of the Oli government? If not, why would those forces want to see Nepal becoming politically stable in an attempt to adapt to Nepal? But apart from these speculations, if this movement is considered to be the result of the great anger of the youth of Nepal’s desperate andless youth, then what will be the conditions of peace there? There is no scope for the current political parties and their famous leaders in the option they have expected. They also need account of the wealth of these leaders and their descendants soon and strict action against them. The search for them is between some amendments within the scope of the current constitution.

Why did Balen back back from the leadership of the interim government?

After the violence in Nepal stopped, the picture emerged in search of leadership for the leadership of the interim government was clear that this movement did not have any face or a common leader. The agitation and broader violence overturned the government. Who would run the government further, either an united in any name did not become united to the answer or the name that emerged the most pulled back.

Kathmandu’s independent Mayor Balen Shah made a lot of headlines to this movement. But he denied the leadership of the interim government. If there was pressure, he argued that by arguing for a stake in the election. Interestingly, the movement of the youth. Anger to the generation whom they consider to be responsible for the ruin of Nepal and their plight. But when the opportunity came to challenge the leadership of the interim government, he agreed to the name of Sushila Karki, 73, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Why ?

Government is difficult to run even more than movement

When governments are overturned through mass movements, then even a bigger challenge is presented in front of the leaders. As soon as a goal is met, there is a question on the next. The challenge is to fulfill the dreams that are shown to fill the excitement among the agitators. But as soon as the system is handled, the ground reality is encountered and then the stunning faces of the movement also become part of the same system.

It is a different thing to lead the chaotic crowd. But after coming into the government, the responsibility of disciplining this mob makes supporters in the court of protest. Opposition has something else. The power binds within the boundaries. There are no exceptions to the face or the face seen in front of the Nepal movement. He feels further difficulties.

The interim government will face severe challenges

The problems of the interim government of Nepal can be bigger than the government to be elected in many ways. The reason is that the flames of the movement may have stopped, but its heat is still intact. The broad-scale violence has demolished the administration. The law and order situation is worse. Already, Nepal, who has already struggled with economic crises, has suffered a widespread loss of money along with the people in this movement.

The compensation for that loss is not easy. The industrial structure is disturbed. Tourism is badly affected. The agitators are offering sleeves to pay the account of previous governments and leaders running them. On the one hand, under the Constitution, the elected government has been discharged due to the movement and on the other hand a new government is to be selected through the new elections under the same constitution.

The parties, leaders and their families who have been targeted for collecting immense wealth from corrupt means, would they want the agitators to participate in the elections? Interim Prime Minister Karki will have a challenge to implement the demands of the agitators, which he has accepted.

The general elections in the country are prominent in this within 6 to 12 months. They have also accepted the demand of the agitators of the formation of citizens and military government for the common representation of citizens and army. Karki also has to complete the formation of a powerful judicial commission to investigate the property of corrupt political parties and their leaders. He also promises to investigate a fair investigation into widespread violence during the movement. A demand of agitators has been fulfilled. She was to dissolve Parliament.

The new government has to understand India is a true friend

There are many reasons for Nepal’s plight and political instability. The compulsion of mismatched alliances arose due to no party getting a clear majority. Then there are every dhatkaram to gain power or keep it running. Despite this, in the last seventeen years, the average age of the governments there was fourteen-fifteen months. The rejuvenation of the economic condition of the country cannot be expected by such governments by developing a planned structure of development.

Nepal’s misfortune was that many of the governments in the meantime were inclined towards China. Communist parties and their leaders divided into the factions kept distance from India due to prejudices. He ignored this historical truth that Nepal and India have a centuries old bread-daughter relationship. India not only respects the sovereignty of Nepal, but has been in every crisis. In the world of international diplomacy, no country is a permanent friend and enemy of anyone, but India-Nepal’s relationship has been exception.

Both countries of the majority Hindu population have dubbed like a pearl of garland in all subjects like worship system, traditions, civilization and culture. India has always been honest towards its neighbors. Nepal has a more special place. The government and the public have to do the work of political stability, development and peace of Nepal. But on many fronts, he will have to seek the help of friendly countries. Whatever government will be formed there, it has to be understood that no other country can be an alternative to Nepal.

India cannot remain oblivious from Nepal. The disturbance and unrest there leaves its impact on India. With the coronation of Sushila Karki on the post of Prime Minister, it should be expected that there will be a return of old warmth between the governments of the two countries.

Also read: How long will the interim government last in Nepal, why was the first 9 -year record made?