After the arrest of Jammu and Kashmir’s only Aam Aadmi Party MLA Mehraj Malik under the stringent Public Safety Act (PSA), there was a fight between the husband and wife, whose video has gone viral on social media.
Fatima Farooq, who is allegedly a local politician and is known for her fiery speeches, was living live-streaming on Monday evening while defending Mehraj Malik, when her husband suddenly stopped her, which turned into a debate between a live-stream couple.
Fatima looked quite angry at Mehraj Malik’s detention and was defending her in the video regardless of her political differences. In the video, he can be heard saying, “Everyone knows that I am not a supporter of Malik and I also condemn his derogatory words against the deputy commissioner, but applying PSA on him has all, especially the poor people disappointed.”
Suddenly, her husband came in and asked him, “What are you doing live” and “What do you need to fuck?” After this, the matter gets hot, the husband tries to snatch the phone from his wife’s hand to stop the live stream and hears it threatening, “I will press your neck …”.
After this, Fatima stands in her place, the camera rotates towards her and says, “Look everyone! She is my husband, standing against the truth!”
This video is now widely broadcast on social media and has sparked debate on the challenges of political differences in marriage.
Mehraj Malik’s detention
Mehraj Malik, Aam Aadmi Party MLA from Jammu and Kashmir, was detained on Monday under the Rigorous Public Safety Act (PSA) for dissolving a public system in Doda district of the state.
Malik’s affection for the first time an existing MLA was detained under PSA. The Public Safety Act is a specific, preventive preventive law applicable in Jammu and Kashmir, under which a case is allowed to be detained for up to two years without any charges or trial.
AAP leader Sanjay Singh reached Srinagar on Wednesday, although he was not allowed to attend a protest. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah condemned Singh’s ‘custody’ and said that it is “good” for democracy in the state.