Naam: 4 big reasons for not watching Ajay Devgan’s film after 20 years!

Ajay Devgan’s two films have been released in a month. First- Singham Again and second- Naam. ‘Singham Again’ was released on Diwali, which was rivaled by ‘Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3’. The picture has been made by Anees Bazmee. Now Anees and Ajay Devgan’s film has arrived. But neither of them promoted it. Its release was announced secretly and it was released. Work on this was done 20 years ago, but now it is in theatres. There is a lot of good and bad in the film. Know the reason for not watching.

Actually, this film which came 20 years ago has been described as better than ‘Singham Again’. Actually, at that time the makers did not have that many options to try something new in the picture. Despite this, the film was made as good as it could have been. But this film made 20 years ago also made a mistake.

4 big reasons for not watching the movie!

  • Songs in the movie: At this time, the way the audience watches and understands films has completely changed. In such a situation, the biggest mistake in the film is that songs have been added anywhere. Watching the film, it seems as if it was inserted forcefully. As if a thrilling situation is going on in the film, then a romantic song comes from somewhere. In such a situation, it is difficult to understand what has happened. Where did the story reach from?
  • Fakeness in film: When this film was made 20 years ago, the makers would not have had that many options. In such a situation, there are many such scenes in the film, which look completely fake. There is one scene in particular – where blood is visible on Ajay Devgan’s face. Looking at it, it seems as if blood has been applied separately on the face. The dialogues are also very strange, which will make you feel strange for the first time after listening to them.
  • Acting not right: Actually, Ajay Devgan’s acting in ‘Naam’ is quite good. Looking at him it did not feel as if he was acting artificially. But seeing the acting of other actors of the film, especially Sameera Reddy, it seemed that she was over-acting. The artificiality was visible in his acting.
  • Climax: The story of the film is good. But the screenplay did not seem anything special. Especially here we should talk about the climax, which has been dragged forcefully. The 20-minute climax could have been ended sooner and should have been done. There is nothing in it for more than 5 minutes. However, one does not get bored watching the film. But the slow pace in the end made matters worse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *